Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WxDownload Fast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 20 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WxDownload Fast[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This non-notable software has no third party sources and search for sources does not reveal any significant. Three sources listed are about libraries and features that this software implemented, but they never mention this software. Miami33139 (talk) 08:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A google news search reveals mentions(?) in various languages. Polarpanda (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- These are user submitted comments, version announcements, one sentence mentions, and appearance in lists. These are not acceptable RS for notability in any language. Miami33139 (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.