Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wuzzuf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wuzzuf[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional ref-bombed article about a company that does not pass WP:GNG. Sources I found are of a similar standard to the ones in the article - PR stuff, routine business announcements and paid advertorials.The only source that appeared to be promising (Stepfeed) is actually a thinly disguised announcement for a trade show. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a promotional page on an unremarkable jobs site. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advert, WP:PROMO. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 14:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.