Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wunderbars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wunderbars[edit]

delete It is a stub with little to no room for improvment and there is a NPOV issue. Jakken 00:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:VSCA. --Kinu 01:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanispamcruftisement. Who wants to read that? Royboycrashfan 02:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as that delightful (yet hard to pronounce) portmanteau quoted by Kinu and Royboycrashfan. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 03:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly nn and the last sentence reads like an ad. --† Ðy§ep§ion † 03:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly-written advert. (aeropagitica) 07:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising. JIP | Talk 07:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with JIP -- delete as advertising. -- Simon Cursitor 08:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - remove these wiki-abusers forthwith! Camillus (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Avi 16:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. That really looks like pure adv. Gtabary 20:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertisement. --Allen 00:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An advert. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 13:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.