Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wunder (gamer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wunder (gamer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The BBC article is only a mention, and the other 3 sources cited no longer exist Ficaia (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Archives for the other 3 sources: Database profile, no coverage, passing mention, even more fleeting passing mention. Looking like little or no indepth and direct coverage exists, just a few name drops in connection to the team. -- ferret (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some better coverage found with WP:VG/S: fairly focused on Wunder, fairly indepth, fair amount of focus and a link to an interview. Note that he previously played under "Wunderwear" but shortened it due to a trademark/copyright issue. Searching on that finds a passing mention, a few sentences on his performance one week. -- ferret (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and Denmark. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I waited a bit to see if anything else appeared but so far nothing has. Per the sourcing I looked at above, I don't think this individual really passes the bar. Very little coverages focuses on the player directly, with most of it in the context of the team. No particular awards or other noteworthy accomplishments. The above sources are all very specific media outlets that focus on esports (except ESPN which is more broadly sports), and it represents basically the totality of our usual reliable sources. Dotesports has been challenged in some FA source reviews, so with so much of the coverage coming from them, I don't see GNG met. There's nothing more to use. -- ferret (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The four sources already cited are: this one from the subject's sponsor, which is pure promotion; one BBC report about the team, name-dropping Hansen's name once and misquoting his nickname; and two dead links. Trying on one's own to scare up some more, one finds many sites by fans and gamers, e.g. that, wikimirrors such as this, and so forth. A case of (generously) too soon. -The Gnome (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.