Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wued

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. I normally don't close AFDs, but I am closing this one because the page in question is a blatant attack page and a violation of WP:BLP. If I had seen this while on Huggle or at Special:Newpages, I would have deleted it under CSD G10. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wued[edit]

A non-notable neologism KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i think this entry should stay on wiki because its really emerging as an internet phenomenon, i see this term being used in many of the online games i play. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackanator99 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC) — Jackanator99 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete — No evidence of notability. macy (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article was previously erased due to its non-notability, so there's no need to add it a second time. It's unsourced and nonsensical. Beemer69 ^chitchat 13:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP is not a dictionary or guide to slang, see also WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why wasn't this a speedy? --Ernestvoice (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this unsourced neologism; WP isn't a dictionary. Cliff smith ^talk 17:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't look to meet any of the speedy criteria, but that doesn't mean it's notable or sourceable. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 18:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It was previously speedied and removed, but the page was (wrongly) created again. Beemer69 ^chitchat 21:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Wikipedia is not a dictionary or guide to slang. Longhair\^talk 04:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.