Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wreathgate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion is not present. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. Feel free to further discuss the article on its talk page, if desired. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wreathgate[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The lead paragraph is one sided and misleading -- BOD -- 22:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's the particular instance of one-sidedness and what did you find misleading? Super-Mac (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the lead paragraph is "one sided and misleading", why don't you just clean it up instead of deleting the whole article? ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 22:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on the Keep, If you have a problem with text you could just change so you think it's a fair representation, not seen your issue yet though. This issue is growing in real time so updates and changes are going to become more and more necessary: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45170622 Super-Mac (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.