Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wouter Schievink
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW, WP:PROF, and WP:GNG all cited. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 04:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wouter Schievink[edit]
- Wouter Schievink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: Subject appears well below the bar for notability Fell Gleamingtalk 21:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Clearly notable subject, sought after opinions, well cited in news sources and extremely well published author. Basket of Puppies 03:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep A simple search shows much notability. He's well cited, as earlier stated, and a well known author, and neuro surgeon. MJ94 03:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The list of publications section is overblown and unnecessary, however, the subject has been described as a "world-renowned expert in familial aneurysms and strokes" by Medical News Today.[1] Location (talk) 04:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarification: The bit in Medical News Today does appear to be a press release by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in order to generate interview requests for the subject and another doctor. Still, this guy appears to be a big wig at a renowned hospital. Location (talk) 04:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Pioneering expert in his field and editor of Frontiers in Bioscience. Viriditas (talk) 04:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.