Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World sales and certifications for Madonna
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete given lack of sources that fail to appear. Can be added to discography at a later date if these are provided. —Sean Whitton / 11:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
World sales and certifications for Madonna[edit]
- World sales and certifications for Madonna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Indiscriminate information. Fails WP:V and WP:RS as there are no inline cites or references. This article is just a listing of forked out information from respective albums. Anything useful can be merged into respective albums or Madonna albums discography. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Any of this information should be merged into the discography page and/or the respective albums page if it's not there already. (Personally, I'm a bit disgusted that Madonna has sold so many albums, but what can I say? She is a Material Girl after all...) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 16:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral for now. This is hardly indiscriminate information, and merging into Madonna's discography would probably make that article too big. It seems a reasonable sub-article, but badly needs to be sourced. If something needs merging, AFD isn't the place to bring it. If anyone can come up with reliable sources, I would say Keep and then start a merge discussion if need be.--Michig (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unnecessary subpage - content should be in discography page and sourced. PhilKnight (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.