Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World War Underground

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Reminder: Being created by a blocked or banned user isn't a rationale for deletion. But, I trust Ghost Destroyer's assessment. Missvain (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

World War Underground[edit]

World War Underground (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another non-notable album GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another non-notable compilation album by Soul Crusher. Sources are crappy, google search didn't return much better sources (also, the name makes searching difficult). I wonder how many of Soul Crusher's trash is left, though I have a slight suspicion that this is just the beginning and many of these still lurk in the shadows. He is gone (he is indeffed), but we are still suffering from all of his non-notable articles. But anyways, this is not notable. Isn't there anything that would make these articles gone faster? I mean, if there are still lots of these unnotable stuff, nominating each of them one by one is tedious. We need something to rid of this stuff quickly. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The user who created the page was blocked with revoked TPA and the article has been tagged for notability.

Cupper52Discuss! 09:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.