Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Heritage Memory Net

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Fritzpoll (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Heritage Memory Net[edit]

nn website plans. Google only 39 hits.[1] EWJNK (talk) 17:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would think that http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/326 gives a certain notability. While CRYSTAL would normally be a concern with a future launch date, I doubt that it is here. This is evidence of the project's existence. I would also point out that the nominator is a new account whose activity seems mostly connected with AfD. Peridon (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete anyway, the one source cited by Peridon isn't enough. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Global Memory Net --neon white talk 21:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A "World+Heritage+Memory+Net" Google search turns up multiple sources. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jamie^☆S93 17:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since this website is apparently co-sponsored by UNESCO [2] I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. Passportguy (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.