Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Global Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

World Global Network[edit]

World Global Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable company that fails WP:ORGDEPTH. The article's sources are a website with a poor reputation, a unreliable "award" website, a Forbes article that makes no mention of the subject, and a press release. This article caught my attention because of Fabio Galdi was recently created by an SPA, in what appears to be an effort to promote the subjects. Possible an Orangemoody connection? - MrX 15:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - MrX 15:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - MrX 15:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.