Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Fasting Day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per G5 . Materialscientist (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

World Fasting Day[edit]

World Fasting Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only references are 'self-published' either on their site, or youtube. No GNews hits for 'World fasting Day', and the prose itself states it was founded by a high school student, but no other assertion of notability. - Happysailor (Talk) 22:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No evidence of notability. Lousy sourcing. Same article was first created by User:Worldfastingday (talk · contribs) (probably the high school student), then speedy deleted. That account was blocked as promotional. Then very shortly thereafter the article was created again by Thebookworm24 (talk · contribs), whose account was created (surprise!!) minutes before creating the article. Then (surprise again!!) Mz.Wiz (talk · contribs) and Kingrogeres (talk · contribs) accounts were created just in time to oppose deletion. Sundayclose (talk) 22:47, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: and I think they've forgotten what account they're logged into - they just agreed with themselves [1] - Happysailor (Talk) 23:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.