Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Working moms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Rob ert 01:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Working moms[edit]

Essay about the difficulties facing working mothers. The best reason for deletion might be "unencyclopedic". -- Kjkolb 05:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (Holding vote til more discussion) Do we already have an article (or part of an article) concerning the difficulties of working mothers? YellowPigNowNow 05:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely unencyclopedic editorial.--Jersey Devil 06:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Personal essay, unencyclopædic. (aeropagitica) (talk) 08:21, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 10:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I think it's fair to call this original research, and perhaps also soapboxery. --Deville (Talk) 14:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:34, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge with Double burden. It's a topic desperate for more than the tiny stub at Double burden, and this article isn't so far from being a legitimate rough draft. It has tone problems, but it makes an attempt to present notable opinions and attribute them to verifiable sources. --Allen 00:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR/POV essay. MCB 06:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.