Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Working Out Loud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 05:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Working Out Loud[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This concept has several Google hits but they are all blogs by people promoting this idea. I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources to establish notability, so it fails WP:GNG. Likewise all references are to blogs and are not reliable. There may also be original research. To me it appears to be another business fad that someone happened to write a Wikipedia article on. BethNaught (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See the comment placed on the talk page for this entry. BethNaught (talk) 08:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Another one of those concept articles with typically few sources.BennyHillbilly (talk) 08:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.