Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workers' Liberty Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects may be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Workers' Liberty Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minuscule subgroup with no sources; not within cooee of GNG. Frickeg (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete clearly fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 10:11, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Alliance for Workers' Liberty - verifiable that the Australian group exists, but nothing else other than information published by the AWL. AWL article already mentions this Australian group, so nothing to merge. Warofdreams talk 20:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 20:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too small a constituency with a lack of press, etc. Knox490 (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Searching on Trove returns almost no references on this group. Nick-D (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - just as many very weird miniscule right wing groups need a home article, so do the trotskyists JarrahTree 05:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, along with the Zionist Jehovist National Socialist Party and similar tiny and fringe political groups, as we usually do. Bearian (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.