Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Work4 Labs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 05:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Work4 Labs[edit]

Work4 Labs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have found only expected mentions at Books, News and Highbeam, nothing else convincing aside from the apparent sources such as Forbes and TechCrunch which are acceptable, but that's basically. The article is still overall questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lacks independent sources. Just corporate PR. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete. advertisement page. InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: After sifting through the vast tracts of press releases and other promotional material, I've found next to nothing to help establish notability for the article subject. Honestly, this could almost be G11'd.. Chrisw80 (talk) 01:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.