Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worfield Golf Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and redirect, with Peter's solution implemented. Maxim (☎) 21:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worfield Golf Club[edit]

Non-notable golf course. The article (as of this nomination) is absent of references, and the content fails to explain why this course is different from any 18-hole haven. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - notability has not been established. Courses that have hosted major events should be kept but I don't think that the English Men's Senior Championship is in this category. TerriersFan (talk) 02:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Shropshire#Sport. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The best solution would have been to Merge to Worfield (see List of civil parishes in Shropshire, but unfortunately the parish does not have an article yet. I would therefore suggest that the article be moved to Worfield (a new stub article) and become its golf section. According It might be listed in an article on Sport in Shropshire, but should not appear at all in a county article. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC) DONE - SEE BELOW Peterkingiron (talk) 20:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- I have followed up my suggestion and converted the article inot a stub on the village, with the text if the old article as a section of it. Having done that, I consider that the article is now a stub on a notable subject. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.