Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wordbee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wordbee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It would appear to me that this company (and by extension its software) is a "run of the mill" enterprise. It gains numerous WP:GHITS but the overwhelming majority of them appear to be routine software reviews that do not assist the WP:CORPDEPTH test, nor any other assertion of notability. The previous AFD discussion of the company "Wordbee SA" (S.A. (corporation) is located here. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as paid-for spam. MER-C 11:41, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sign of WP:CORPDEPTH and from reading the previous deletion discussion it doesn't look like anything has happened since to make it more notable. --bonadea contributions talk 18:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.