Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word Workout
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 18:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Word Workout[edit]
- Word Workout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to be, in essence, an advertisement for a proprietary set of educational workbooks. Aside from the publications of Nancy K. Lewkowitz (who seems to be identical with "Word Workshop", the publisher of the workbooks), I can find only one study that deals with the specific methodology treated in the article; the other references in the article do not appear to be about Word Workshop per se. I'll say that this article violates both WP:NOTADVERTISING and—because of the absence of multiple, independent substantive sources—the GNG. (Note to Googlers: The words "word workout" are used in various other educational programs for vocabulary activities that are unrelated to the topic of this article.) Deor (talk) 04:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Deor. Lewkowitz, whose publications are used as most of the references, is the author of the material per this link from Word Workout's official site. Dismas|(talk) 08:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Deor. The material also looks as if it completely fails Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#cite_note-textbooks-4. I don't see anyway to salvage this article. --Aspro (talk) 12:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.