Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woody's Roundup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects are cheap, so while there seems to be a rough agreement that the title is an unlikely search term, somebody may wish to recreate this as a redirect. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Woody's Roundup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, unsourced, fails WP:GNG, etc. The article is about a fictional TV show shortly seen on Toy Story 2. The "show" is nothing significant and also has no episodes. The article may also constitutes original research. Mediran (t • c) 10:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A fictional TV show inside a movie is not notable. I would be open to a redirect to Toy Story 2, but I think the search term is so unlikely that there is no real reason to not just straight up delete this page. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect, probably into List of Toy Story characters. Other major movie series (and Toy Story is certainly a major movie series) have catch-all pages for minor characters/details, and that page seems to be the one for Toy Story. p.s. Redirects for this sort of thing are common and (in my opinion) appropriate. e.g. Al's Toy Barn redirects to Toy Story 2. Adpete (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This entire article is worth two sentences in Toy Story 2 article, plot section. It has no due weight and no notability. That said, this huge degree of overcoverage of other works of art, which is a violation of WP:NFCC, frightens me; one day, someone is bound to sue Wikipedia for overextending fair use. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Agree search term would be unlikely, but not impossible. --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.