Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wong Ping Pui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Ping Pui[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hampered as I am by my poor understanding of naming conventions in Hong Kong and by inability to read Chinese, I can't see how this person is notable enough to meet either WP:ARTIST or the WP:GNG. The potted bio on the Hong Kong University pages says he has won awards, but does not say what they were. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In-depth coverage in foreign media of this artist and his artwork: CNN Travel, Singapore Lianhe Zaobao; and local media: Headline Daily, The Sun, HK, Eastweek. ~~I'll try to further expand~~ I have expanded the article to make clear his notability. Der yck C. 21:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article was created as part of the Smithsonian Asia-Pacific Art editathon. Der yck C. 21:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Der yck C. 16:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Der yck C. 16:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Deryck. The deletion nominator should search for Chinese sources first, which should easily prove notability. sst ✈ 05:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.