Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonderland Resort

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shereth 21:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Wonderland Resort

Wonderland Resort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Despite a claim that, "Because its closure has broken so many traditions, it justifies notability in Wikipedia", I don't see any evidence that the existence or closure of this resort was in any way notable per WP:ORG. There's no evidence this was anything other than a regular campsite, it's sourced wholly to its own brochures and there don't appear to be reliable sources from which to expand it. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 20:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom as not notable. Dpmuk (talk) 21:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Almost squeezes by WP:NOTPAPER, but not quite. LotLE×talk 23:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Oh how sad!. I've been to that resort as a much younger person. I didn't know it was closed to the public. It was a bit of a dive even in the mid 80s, but the views are spectacular. I'm gonna try to rescue this one, but I trust the nom did adequate searching. I have access to some "offline" resources that may help. If I don't return to show notability, consider this a "delete"...Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.