Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WonderWitch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to WonderSwan#Technical specifications. czar 08:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WonderWitch[edit]

WonderWitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PRODUCT. Article contains no references whatsoever. Too few WP:RS online. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is there to merge exactly? The entire article is unsourced. --The1337gamer (talk) 12:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • [1] is a WP:RS at least mentioning it. I suspect there may be other period pieces referring to WonderWitch. Merge and redirect (as appropriate) to WonderSwan. --Izno (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    [2] also. Definitely worth a mention at the minimum. --Izno (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I see the NL reference is already included. There is also [3]. --Izno (talk) 13:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.