Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women of the Apocalypse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Women of the Apocalypse[edit]
- Women of the Apocalypse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book, appears to fail WP:NBOOKS. ukexpat (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 14:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is [1]. Fails WP:BK. Joe Chill (talk) 15:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:BK. Warrah (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not (yet) notable. The book came out a few months ago; if it ends up getting more coverage, or goes into a wider release, or otherwise becomes notable, then an article may be warranted. But as it stands, the sourcing is not available to make a good show of it. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails to show evidence of meeting book-related notability requirements. --EEMIV (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.