Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in Cinema Collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Cinema Collective[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, lacks "significant coverage" (WP:ORGDEPTH) in "independent" reliable sources about the organization itself. Also lacks WP:DIVERSE. Sources are mostly sensationalized coverage and routine news surrounding controversies or such statements since its members are celebrities (WP:INHERITORG). Inherent notability (assumed by media) has resulted in articles about its establishment and objectives and not based on their contributions or impact. The Doom Patrol (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film. The Doom Patrol (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A non exhaustive search brings up plenty, this meets WP:NORG. Here's 2 SIRS sources, and a couple more helpful ones
1. Mathew, Jimin S; Isac, Alna Mariya. , Journal of International Women's Studies
2. Nair, Tara S. Economic and Political Weekly(available on ProQuest via TWL to verify)
3. Less in-depth but still helpful [1] (available on ProQuest via TWL to verify)
4. Here's a another helpful source [2]. It has a lot of background, then moves into statements from members, so borderline for SIRS.

—siro χ o 21:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in view of the reliable sources identified above that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.