Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women Media Center

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein. North America1000 01:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women Media Center[edit]

Women Media Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:ORG. Greenbörg (talk) 09:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 09:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 09:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete these is a lack of sources showing that this organization is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep HighBeam turned up several sources which I added to the article. The one from The Quill is entirely about the organization and what it does. It's significant coverage. Turning up other sources on Google is problematic because you have to weed out the Women's Media Center sources and there is also an Arab Women Media Center which is apparently a separate organization. In addition to what I found, I am sure there is plenty of sourcing in Urdu, too. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.