Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WomanSpirit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WomanSpirit[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability, only 25 google news results, and a very small circulation. Many of the main google results are just primary sources as well. ShimonChai (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The related person Ruth Mountaingrove is also up for deletion here --Theredproject (talk) 19:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Google News isn't really a great resource for coverage of materials that ceased publication before the web... This one looks to have been pretty influential, though, and looks to pass WP:GNG. It has an entry in the Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women and is mentioned in several other entries, it has its own section in Women's Periodicals in the United States: Social and Political Issues, there's the Lambda Book Report, and several other sources with more-than-a-mention-less-than-a-full-section. It's also the subject of a few university collections, it seems. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Rhododendrites. Google News really isn't a great indicator for something that ceased publication in 1984. /Julle (talk) 10:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.