Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfpac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfpac[edit]

While I feel that the group is somewhat notable, this article is poorly-written and largely unsourced (and, to be honest, the only reason I started an article on their album was because of the nudity in the artwork). Ibaranoff24 (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~I am also nominating the following related pages:~~

Delete all Simply having a member of another notable group isn't enough if no reliable sources exist. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per User:TenPoundHammer Niteshift36 (talk) 00:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't spend a lot of time searching, but I added another source just now, an article about the group in The Morning Call. With that, a concert review in The Cincinnati Enquirer and an album review in Allmusic, there's enough at least for a "weak" keep per WP:BAND criterion #1. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking nomination. That's what I was looking for. Thanks! (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.