Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolff Landscape Architecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wolff Landscape Architecture[edit]

Wolff Landscape Architecture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite a number of of references, this appears not to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. It also shows every sign of having been created by an undisclosed paid editor in violation of our Terms of Use. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: After removing a bunch of off-topic, unsourced biographical puffery about the founder, there isn't much left. Other than passing mentions about projects worked on, I was not able to find any in-depth coverage. As for awards, none of these appear to be notable awards, most seem to be back-patting by local trade groups. The two citations linked to awards that I bothered to check, don't even mention Wolff Landscape Architecture and there is no evidence presented that they even worked on them. Toddst1 (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the awards section as it was a direct copy (copyvio) of the company's web page. Toddst1 (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.