Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WoTMUD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WoTMUD[edit]

I tried to PROD this, but apparently it's "not uncontroversial" (although they couldn't be bothered to give any actual reasons why the article should be kept). At any rate, this article cites no sources, except an invalid one, which appears to just be comments made by one of the MUD's creator at some unspecified point. No sources appear on a Google News Archive search [1], [2]. We need sources to have an encyclopedia article, per WP:WEB and WP:N and WP:V. This would probably fit in at the Wheel of Time Wiki, where people could document this MUD without the need to cite the sources Wikipedia requires. Miss Communication (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 04:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - [3] attempts to show where this MUD has been reviewed, but the links provided all seem to be for self-published material (player/user reviews, etc). Nass says "There have also been professional sites which have done reviews, unfortunately I have lost these." - I wonder what these might have been? Will gladly reverse my !vote if they turn up. Marasmusine (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not uncontroversial? I would disagree with that assumption. It's just a non-notable MUD, I don't see anything here worth keeping. Tavix (talk) 04:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - non-notable website A7. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I dropped the relevant info whole into Wheel of Time, and that's pretty much all that can be salvaged here. I see no sources, unfortunately. rootology (C)(T) 16:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.