Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wish Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. On a side note, I've noticed that the editor's name was the same as a marketing group's and I've blocked him based on the username, with the coda that if he can show that he is not here to create spam articles and will change his username, that I'm willing to unblock him. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wish Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. See PROD notice for reasons. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 18:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article contributor's only Wikipedia contributions have been about this firm and its new COO. The article sources are a stack of primary sources. No evidence of notability found. AllyD (talk) 20:53, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam. . . Mean as custard (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. On a side note, I'm probably going to nominate the affiliated article Frank Cianciulli for deletion sometime soon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.