Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winterland (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy. Shanel ^§ 06:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Winterland (band)[edit]

This article should be deleted because it hasn't produced any record yet. [1] When they are famous, we can recreate the article. Delete as per non-notable. Tony Bruguier 02:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vanity page promotion and a poorly drafted one at that. This wannabe group of self described musicians has not made even a single recording! Thus, not notable under any standard. Ande B 02:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possible speedy for nn band.--Jersey Devil 02:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nn band. --Ter e nc e Ong 04:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No recordings, a small clutch of sporadic performances, doesn't meet present criteria. Delete but good luck and all that. Ac@osr 08:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. There seem to be at least two bands also called Winterland that are more notable than this group. Paddles 14:08, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete the article doesn't even assert notabilty (CSD A7) as I understand it. - Motor (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 21:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. I see no assertion of notability. Next time use {{db-band}}. I tagged it. Grand master ka 04:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Motor Crazynas 06:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.