Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winnipeg Lucania FC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  18:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg Lucania FC[edit]

Winnipeg Lucania FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. The team has no RSes and none can be found. The team's league may be notable, but the team itself is not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 11:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per Nfitz, performances in a national competition satisfy FOOTYN with the additional source indicating wider GNG. Fenix down (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • What a joke. Can you find independent coverage of that national competition even of this team participating in it? Fourth level soccer in Canada isn't even recognized so I'll save you the trouble. I'm going to find second division ice hockey teams in England and demand that because they play in a national competetion (where five people attend and no media coverage is given) be kept. You've all got your heads up your asses so far you can't think or shit straight. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Independent coverage of that competition? There's coverage. Here's one from the most recent. [2] Nfitz (talk) 21:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 11:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.