Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winn O'Donnell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Winn O'Donnell[edit]

Delete: Non-notable comedian, etc. 38 Google hits were mostly Wikipedia and YouTube (my Aunt Esther has more hits). De-prodded with no explanation (except to put the article in the "non-notable comedians" category - I guess he's into the self-deprecating style of comedy). —Wknight94 (talk) 04:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. lol, the references that the editor put are hilarious. "Astrological sign is Taurus <ref>Astrology.com</ref>" But anyway, non-notable comedian, as the editor admits himself. Axem Titanium 06:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reason given in the nomination. ArmAndLeg 21:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SkierRMH,07:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm sure the guy has a lot of potential, and when he lives up to some of that, an article about him will be welcomed. Until then - well, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. John Broughton | Talk 16:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Verkhovensky 00:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.