Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winjit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Of note is that this BBC article provides what could be considered as significant coverage, but on Wikipedia, topic notability requires qualification with significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources (more than one source). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Winjit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable. The reference pretended to be an article in The Hindu is marked on their site as a press release. The siliconindia article isn;'t marked, but that's what it is also. DGG ( talk ) 17:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now - It's worth noting this article was actually deleted in 2008 by Jimfbleak as G11 and my searches find nothing to suggest better sourcing and notability with results such as this, this and this. SwisterTwister talk 18:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article does not meets WP:ORG nor it have significant coverage. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 12:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No signs of notability. Lakun.patra (talk) 07:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.