Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsor Tower (Detroit)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Windsor Tower (Detroit)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable building Sergeant Cribb (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem notable. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article does not meet any of the requirements in WP:GNG. At no point in time has this building received coverage from reliable and notable sources. --Rjhymel (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lafayette Park, Detroit. Apparently the subject building is one of the constituent buildings of this Mies van der Rohe-designed residential project which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. However, the building is not notable enough to deserve an article of its own, and neither are its sister buildings Lafayette Pavilion Apartments, Lafayette Towers Apartments East, and Lafayette Towers Apartments West. Nominator might want to take a look at those articles as well. --MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.