Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinShell (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WinShell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite a previous AfD which closed as keep and which was 'flagged for rescue' by the Article Rescue Squadron, there are still scant sources to demonstrate notability. There's a smattering of trivial sourcing, but nothing to pass GNG AFAIK. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. How do the multiple independent sources not establish notability? They did the first time around & they still do now. --Karnesky (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned that they all seem to be trivial mentions. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - A six-page exclusive article is not "trivial" by any stretch of the imagination. --Karnesky (talk) 13:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which one is the six page article again? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per the six-page mention in the German-language book source. --Pnm (talk) 09:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.