Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wimpy FLV Player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wimpy FLV Player[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nor can I. Delete. Crafty (talk) 23:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you guys talking about?? Google "wimpy player" and you get 121,000 results. How could that not be "significant coverage"? Please be advised that when people (like you) happily and quickly erase other peoples' work, just like was done with Jimmy Wales' own contribution recently, it creates a disincentive for the writer to create any more new pages. That's why I stopped creating any more new pages, as a matter of fact, even though I continue to make dozens of grammatical corrections to existing pages. User:Markus451 —Preceding undated comment added 01:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Read WP:GOOGLEHITS and WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Two sentences that don't even claim notability. Miami33139 (talk) 05:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's a couple of google news hits in German. Polarpanda (talk) 19:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you post the links? Joe Chill (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A couple of Google hits doesn't make it notable. Anything can be posted on the Internet and get Google hits. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 01:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.