Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Munyeta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 11:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Willy Munyeta[edit]

Willy Munyeta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. The article claims that he's a magical prophet who can perform divine miracles, so even if this article passes, it needs major cleanup to remove the bogus crap. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Delete Might be something out there helping with notability, but I have my doubts. South Nashua (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I couldn't find any sources that were wholly independent of the belief that Munyeta is a prophet with divine powers. Zambian "news" sources appear to give credulous and uncritical treatment to the subject. It's not possible to build an NPOV encyclopedia article from those. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I had the same experience looking into this as did LL: the closest thing I could come to was a story about him being jailed which also flatly stated that he is "known by his accurate prophecies both local and international, unheard miracles, signs and wonders and timely messages" [1], and I couldn't find out who the publisher of this was or whether they have a connection to Munyeta. Mangoe (talk) 19:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete the sources seem very slim, and in any case the article probably needs a good WP:TNT even if it were notable. InsertCleverPhraseHere 21:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete no serious sources beyond unverifiable afro-paparazzi hype. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, weak and credulous sources. Guy (Help!) 13:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.