Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William W. Johnstone bibliography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to William_W._Johnstone#Bibliography. Moot--now redirected. DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William W. Johnstone bibliography[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to break WP:DIRECTORY, very few of his books seem to be notable enough for their own article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with author page. Author page is not big at all and since he is dead, bibliography is unlikely to expand any more. Removing the redlinks and placing them in two or three column format would make it fit in well with the author article.--Sodabottle (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with that. Its probably a better alternative to deletion. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 17:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Now bibliography is in the main article in a 4 column format. So do we delete or redirect this one?--Sodabottle (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect would probably be best. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technical question : what happens to the AfD now?. Does it get closed early or runs its course, in case someone else comes and wants a separate article?--Sodabottle (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.