Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Daemon Hillin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Daemon Hillin[edit]

nn actor/model/something. Also likely vanity/COI/autobio article. Prod removed by IP whose sole contribs consist of three edits to that article, with the fourth being the prod removal. Upon checking the sourcing of statements, IMDB lists one indie credit (so doesn't meet ACTOR), and the LA Times coverage was trivial - Hillin was not "honored as a Millenial Mason and for his dedication to the fraternity" Rather, he was asked a question or two, and appears in about three lines of the article, as well as "showing off his Masonic bling" in the photo gallery for the article (which was used as a source and should not have been). Highest hits for his name are blog syndication of the LA Times article. As there are only a few different usernames or IPs focusing on this article, I would suggest salting this, as it seems to be a promo piece. MSJapan (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER, as evidenced above (only one acting role, trivial LA Times news coverage). --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N and WP:ENTERTAINER Almost no notability. Artene50 (talk) 00:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely not notable. Simple as that. Austin46 (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ENTERTAINER, the LA Times coverage is no more than a passing reference (and not even related to his work as an actor). Blueboar (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.