Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Cutter and Josiah Savage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by User:Graeme Bartlett (speedy G12) (NAC). Raymie (t • c) 14:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
William Cutter and Josiah Savage[edit]
- William Cutter and Josiah Savage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Uses a blog as its only source. WP:OR Phearson (talk) 02:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note I think it is the blog. The Interior (Talk) 02:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE seems to be un-notable and self-promotion Alan - talk 03:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Possible hoax; I haven't yet found any mention of this outside of the snowhillhistoricalsociety site. If they were infamous, they would be mentioned elsewhere. If this is real, they are quite thoroughly forgotten. Brianyoumans (talk) 03:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I deleted this as it was a word for word copy of the blog. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 12:12, 10 March 2011 Graeme Bartlett (talk | contribs) deleted "William Cutter and Josiah Savage" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://snowhillhistoricalsociety.wordpress.com/cutter-and-savage/). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.