Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Chilufya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
William Chilufya[edit]
- William Chilufya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.' PROD was contested on the grounds that he was named player of the year in Namibia. I see no evidence of this award generating significant coverage. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Although it needs sources, it does not seem to fail notability. I understand Namibia is NOT a fully professional league according to WP:FPL which is a prerequisite for WP:NFOOTY in section 2 ("Players who have appeared in a fully-professional league"), BUT subject participated in in international competition, which had teams of Fully-Professional Leagues (Nigeria and Tunisia) playing, scoring a hat-trick [1]. WP:FPL on its own is a source of disagreement and the reason why Namibia is not considered professional is not clear there. So, since WP:NSPORT says that it "should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis" and since the subject (other than scoring a hat-trick on an international competition) also was top scorer for a national competition [2] (his name was spelled "Shilufya" instead) I think he is personally notable. Article still needs sources and references, though. And a lot of improvement too. -- Loukinho (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - has played (and scored) in the CAF Champions League, which is Africa's top continental club competition - notable enough for me. GiantSnowman 12:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Fails WP:GNG? Full-page coverage: here, here, here, here here and so on and so on, all from top-tier african sources. A couple of these are behind paywalls but i've subscribed for a week just for this AfD if anyone's interested in the full contents. These are all from the first few pages of google searching 'William Chilufya Football' (there seems to be a politician with the same name). With all due respect I suggest the nominator should re-read WP:BEFORE, and to think that this was PROD-ed. doomgaze (talk) 01:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your input. It is quite clear that this article does meet WP:GNG, and as such I am withdrawing the nomination. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.