Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William "Leffen" Hjelte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yash! 01:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William "Leffen" Hjelte[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not my field, but the references loo either thoroughly unreliable or irrelevant to notability , similarly to the adjacent article. DGG ( talk ) 03:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Subject is documented in multiple reliable secondary sources, which are included on the Reliable Video Game sources list (for full disclosure, I was the creator of this article).--Prisencolin (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep, no new information has come to light since the last AfD to warrant delete. Sources such as Red Bull [1] suggest in depth coverage. Since performance at EVO [2] has given him additional coverage. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 23:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Just a quick glance at the Reference list shows Kotaku, IGN, and Polygon, all three being very notable sources. Above comments explain the rest of my reasoning. Supernerd11 _{Firemind ^_^ Pokedex} 01:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Leffen is one the most well known Esports players today and has progressively been getting more media attention. There are enough sources at the moment for a speedy keep Thehack771 (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what happened with the last AfD, but this isn't as clear-cut as it was made to seem. Nintendo Enthusiast and Gamersyndrome are not reliable sources. And without the new (aforementioned) Red Bull article, there would have been next to no reliable biographical material with which to write an article. So that Red Bull article is good, as is the Kotaku article (though not wholly dedicated to him), and the Daily Dot is decent though cursory. I removed a ton of unreliable sources and original research from the article (the non-notable tournaments should be removed) and I think it's fine to weak keep for now, but if there is no future coverage, it's borderline enough to possibly warrant a merge into the competitive Smash article. czar 16:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.