Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will You Visit Me on Sunday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I don't see a consensus to delete here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will You Visit Me on Sunday[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album. Not sure an Allmusic review in and of itself guarantees notability - the album didn't chart and hasn't had significant cultural impact. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 00:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 00:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 00:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to George Jones albums discography. I tried to find articles covering this album, but Allmusic was the only source that showed up, which does not warrant a reasonably detailed article. HĐ (talk) 02:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It made the Billboard country albums chart, not sure about whatever the equivalent of the 200 was back then. Reviewed in Billboard, rated by The Encyclopedia of Popular Music. Finding other coverage would probably involve going through periodical databases and Jones biographies. Caro7200 (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide the entry in the Encyclopedia? HĐ (talk) 03:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, not at work, so can't give the page number or say if it's anything beyond a rating, but I think it's the 4th volume of Larkin. Caro7200 (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For an entry in the Encyclopedia of Popular Music this album is surprisingly obscure as no search results on Google Scholar are found. HĐ (talk) 13:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, GS is not the best place to look for information on a 1970 album, especially if you're using only the title. My argument is this: Major artist, significant label distributed by larger company, made at least the Billboard country charts, reviewed in AllMusic, reviewed in Billboard, rated by Larkin, the presumption of 1970s coverage (which would have to be found using periodical databases), the presumption of coverage in Jones biographies. Caro7200 (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An album by a major artist is not necessarily notable unless it receives some sort of independent recognition (such as detailed reviews, instead of coverage within biographies). I don't think chart positions automatically warrant notability as mentioned at WP:NMUSIC. HĐ (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see what other editors think. Frankly, biographies and music histories--books--should be used much more often in album stubs and short articles. Caro7200 (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable album that received coverage at time of release, but sources cannot be found online. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would like to see those having access to potential sources expand this article. HĐ (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep album charted and was reviewed by Allmusic. Notable but not by too much.Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.