Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilhelm Derksen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 21:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm Derksen[edit]

Non-notable photographer. Google searches turn up social networking hits; Google News references a German (apparently not the same person, but it might be), and Google Books only has 6 hits, all foreign and not necessarily the same person. There are COI and autobiography tags on the article - which we should note are not reasons to delete it; if in fact Mr. Derksen is notable, it would be OK for him to provide citations (not primary source information) to show us how. My attempts to locate any such notability have, however, come up empty. Frank | talk 20:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--CyberGhostface (talk) 00:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced spam Duffbeerforme (talk) 03:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:BIO. Seems to me to borderline on an advertisement as well, especially considering the username of the creator of the article. --Aka042 (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:BIO. --Crusio (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.