Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilderness of tigers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wilderness of tigers[edit]
- Wilderness of tigers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable theatre company. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep --MacRusgail (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not delete this page. Wilderness of Tigers is pushing the boundaries of what theatre can be in Glasgow and in it's short life has gained much attention from the Scottish theatre industry and the people of Glasgow. I am currently working to create articles on all of the theatre companies, based on research in the Scottish Theatre Archive, as details of the industry are currently perilously sparse on wikipedia. Throwoutyourarms (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this discussion going to progress? [[[Special:Contributions/86.160.70.184|86.160.70.184]] (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)][reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per WP:N - the only real secondary source provided, an article in the Sunday Herald, doesn't even mention the group, at least not by name. No hits for ("Wilderness of Tigers" Glasgow) on Nexis. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - without prejudice, but simply fails notability check. Good luck to 'em. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.