Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Lies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Lies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NBAND. I can't find any google coverage beyond namechecks as part of tour listings. PROD contested by IP. shoy (reactions) 16:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - just not noteworthy for a stand alone article; promo piece, at best. Kierzek (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- non-notable band & promo content. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's no actual stance whatsoever and the sources themselves can also be labeled as this. SwisterTwister talk 03:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.