Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Entertainment Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Entertainment Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. It is also very promotional and subject to WP:TOOSOON. Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional piece of a non-notable company. Fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify agree that it is WP:TOOSOON. Looks like they are starting to sign some bigger names, but coverage is very minimal. FiddleheadLady (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, promotional context. Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can’t find anything that suggests notability --Devokewater ^(talk) 05:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.