Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikspeak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 14:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikspeak[edit]
- Wikspeak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:N. An electronic dictionary application with no independent coverage. Pcap ping 12:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 09:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 02:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete based upon nom's own rationale. JBsupreme (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Two trivial mentions 2-3 years ago and that's it. Doesn't bode well for a piece of software, I imagine it was obsolete before it was ever released. Wine Guy~Talk 11:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seemingly non-notable application. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.